The artifacts indicate that the race left violently. Lawbreakers is, I would say, "harder," which loses a lot of its marketability.List of Strategic resources Artifacts Īdvanced artifacts of an ancient space faring race who has long since left this planet. Which I like, I mean, I'm a bad player so it's nice to press E and wipe the enemy team with little effort. Not to become a subject of Commentocracy, but you have to admit that the ultimate abilities in Overwatch are basically just a handicap mechanic so bad players can feel cool sometimes. And Overwatch appeals to a broader audience. Lawbreakers had like 1 cool cinematic trailer and thats it. Exactly what this guy is talking about in his tweet. They dumped tens of millions into marketing. Why was Overwatch so successful? Because it's Blizzard. I'm dick riding too much but I'm just really disappointed it never gained the traction I feel it deserved. visceral? Don't get me wrong, the art in Overwatch is amazing, but the colorful/cartoony style somewhat lessens the impact of weapons and abilities by comparison. In every other game I'm like "I like these character, I don't like these ones," but in Lawbreakers every character is just badass in their own way. It's the first hero shooter where I can honestly say I enjoy every character.
#Engines stardrive 2 free
There's no redundancy on the kits, they are a whole package.Ĭompared to, say, Paladins, for instance, where a lot of the kits feel like "Here's a few thematic abilities, lets put them on a kit without considering how they work together." Or Overwatch where it's like "Here's a really cool character, now lets give them a special ability which takes up half the kits power budget by giving you 3 free kills every time you use it." Like, man, the mechanics have so much depth to them, build momentum by timing your movement like Quake back in the day, shoot behind you to propel yourself forward, every characters has their own unique style of movement and the kits are really tight, they feel very slick and well thought out. I think of it a lot like Titanfall 2- actually good, but nobody was really expecting much from it so nobody even bothered to give it a try. The sad thing is that Lawbreakers in my opinion is amazing, easily my favorite hero shooter (and my friends as well). I don't see why he thinks he's worthy of success with that track record or thinks he has any relevant perspective on the Indie market. You don't sell an unfinished sequel for $30, after moving on from your first game, and give up on it as wellįuck this dude. You don't sell an unfinished game for $30 then move on to the sequel Stardrive 2 reviews are bad since it apparently is unfinished and he gave up on development there too That's marketing and market analysis, which is something an indie dev needs to do for themselves before they even make their game if they want to be successfulĮven if his games are good, Stardrive reviews say it's unfinished and he canned Stardrive 1 for Stardrive 2 abandoning development for an unfinished game to work on another is a no-no, especially if people bought it/kickstarted it Why did Lawbreakers fail? It's obviously a knock-off/heavily-inspired game and late to a currently saturated genre. Don't be jaded about how others were successful or didn't live up to your standards of success, be curious.
The image he's carving out for himself sucks and has sucked nobody likes a whiner post dev/game-relevant stuff or get off of your game dev Twitter account. What do you think? Has Steam become a market that rewards 'memey' Youtube and Twitch friendly games, with serious, well-produced games being overlooked? Is a huge sales and advertising budget now necessary for success?Įdit: The developer has commented to the post here Sure you can quit your job and follow your dream, but you have an 85% chance to fail in this market. The irony is that Steam opening availability to everyone made it less viable for everyone. There's way more money in serious industry.
#Engines stardrive 2 simulator
Goat Simulator and pigeon dating simulator perfect examples.Īnyway, that's why I'm getting out. Without it, we are experiencing a complete oversaturation where quality is not rewarded. Steam's curation served to regulate the market. An expertly-crafted game from a hugely-respected developer fell flat on its face because there are too many damn games. That game should have been able to at least break even. Watching a game like Lawbreakers fail seals the deal for me. You have to reserve 50% for marketing unless you have an existing presence or strike oil. Quality WAS your marketing.īut now, a 200k budget is utterly insufficient. Pre Greenlight, curation allowed high quality games to get exposure simply by virtue of making it onto the platform. Steam's changes over the past few years have destroyed game companies with ~100k-200k dev budgets.
0 kommentar(er)
